AI Isn’t Your Leadership Team
If you built a “virtual CFO” this year, or a “virtual head of ops,” or a “virtual chief of staff,” I need to tell you something. You didn’t build a leadership team. You built a very fast research assistant with a title.
I want to say that plainly because I keep seeing it, and I keep not seeing anybody name it out loud. The agent can crunch financial data. It can pattern-match across your last twelve quarters. It can produce three scenarios for next year’s budget in the time it takes you to read this sentence. All of that is real, and all of that is useful. None of it is what you actually hired a CFO for.
You didn’t hire your CFO for the spreadsheet math. You hired the CFO for the moment when the spreadsheet says one thing and the market says another and somebody has to weigh both and pick. You hired them for the judgment. That’s the part of the job the agent can’t do, because the agent doesn’t know your market. It doesn’t know that your top salesperson is thinking about leaving. It doesn’t know that the CEO is quietly considering an acquisition. It doesn’t know which of your three job candidate finalists will actually make the team. It doesn’t know anything a leader knows. It has patterns.
The agent narrows the field. That’s the useful part. The human on the org chart still has to make the call. That’s the entire job.
The line worth drawing
The problem with virtual executives isn’t that they exist. It’s that people are treating them like they’ve hired somebody. They feed them the data. They read the output. They accept the output. They move on. That isn’t delegation. That’s abdication with a nicer interface. A CFO who lets an agent tell them which scenario to pick isn’t a CFO anymore. They’re a person nodding at an autocomplete of themselves.
I want to be careful here, because there is a version of this that’s genuinely good and worth investing in. Your CFO uses AI agents to move faster. Your head of ops uses AI agents to see more. Your chief of staff uses AI agents to keep track of more. Those are all good uses. The line to hold is that the agent is the assistant. The human is the executive. The decision belongs to a person whose name goes on the org chart.
Narrowing focus for an agent, so it can process specialized data at speed, is a strength move. Handing the agent your judgment is a different move entirely. Same tool, opposite outcomes. And most of the leaders I talk to right now can’t tell the difference in the moment, because the output looks impressive either way.
Why this is the executive version of thinkslop
I wrote last week about the HBR term “thinkslop,” which is what happens when everyday users hand their thinking to AI and let it produce output they haven’t really examined. The pattern I’m describing is thinkslop at the executive level. Same mechanism. Higher stakes.
When an individual contributor lets AI draft an email that could be a little sharper, that’s a small hit. When a CFO lets an agent decide which vendor to sign a two-year contract with, the whole company inherits the sloppiness. When a head of people lets a virtual HR agent decide who to promote, the culture inherits it. When a CEO lets a “virtual advisor” tell them what the strategy should be, the market inherits it.
These aren’t neutral offloads. Every judgment call a leader outsources to an agent is a decision the organization now has to live with, made by a system that has no stake in what happens next.
What to do instead
Use the agent to prep. Not to decide.
Give it the data. Ask it for scenarios, tradeoffs, patterns, comparisons. Read what it produces. Then close the tab. Talk to your team. Consider what you know that the agent doesn’t. Consider what your gut is telling you and why. Make the call yourself. Be able to say why in a sentence that has your voice in it, not the agent’s.
If the sentence sounds like the agent’s output, you didn’t make a decision. You made a copy-paste.
Human-in-the-loop isn’t a safety feature you bolt onto AI systems. It’s the actual definition of a leadership role. The moment the human is out of the loop, you don’t have a leader anymore. You have a person watching a machine think.
The moral of the story
Your virtual CFO isn’t a CFO. Your virtual head of ops isn’t a head of ops. Your virtual chief of staff isn’t a chief of staff. What you built is a fast, specialized research assistant, and using it as an assistant will make your leadership team meaningfully better. Using it as a substitute for your leadership team will make your organization meaningfully worse, and you probably won’t notice for a quarter or two.
If you can’t find the human in the loop anymore, that’s the thing to fix this week. Not the agent.
Where in your organization is the human quietly out of the loop right now?
Reply to this email or join the conversation in our Free Slack community, Analytics for Marketers!
– Katie Robbert, CEO
|
Need help with your marketing AI and analytics? |
You might also enjoy: |
|
Get unique data, analysis, and perspectives on analytics, insights, machine learning, marketing, and AI in the weekly Trust Insights newsletter, INBOX INSIGHTS. Subscribe now for free; new issues every Wednesday! |
Want to learn more about data, analytics, and insights? Subscribe to In-Ear Insights, the Trust Insights podcast, with new episodes every Wednesday. |
Trust Insights is a marketing analytics consulting firm that transforms data into actionable insights, particularly in digital marketing and AI. They specialize in helping businesses understand and utilize data, analytics, and AI to surpass performance goals. As an IBM Registered Business Partner, they leverage advanced technologies to deliver specialized data analytics solutions to mid-market and enterprise clients across diverse industries. Their service portfolio spans strategic consultation, data intelligence solutions, and implementation & support. Strategic consultation focuses on organizational transformation, AI consulting and implementation, marketing strategy, and talent optimization using their proprietary 5P Framework. Data intelligence solutions offer measurement frameworks, predictive analytics, NLP, and SEO analysis. Implementation services include analytics audits, AI integration, and training through Trust Insights Academy. Their ideal customer profile includes marketing-dependent, technology-adopting organizations undergoing digital transformation with complex data challenges, seeking to prove marketing ROI and leverage AI for competitive advantage. Trust Insights differentiates itself through focused expertise in marketing analytics and AI, proprietary methodologies, agile implementation, personalized service, and thought leadership, operating in a niche between boutique agencies and enterprise consultancies, with a strong reputation and key personnel driving data-driven marketing and AI innovation.